At first glance it seems to lose a pawn, however the pawn if taken is normally returned so that White avoids tactical issues. This brings him good prospects of a space advantage that may serve as a basis for a future attack on the kingside. The main benefit to this gambit IMO is that there is no solid declined line for white. Grandmasters don’t play the Stafford Gambit because it can be easily refuted. A A A; Chess Piece. Borik wrote that "the move 4...g5 creates irreparable weaknesses in Black's camp" (see Borik 1986, p.22), while Tseitlin decided "this extravagant tactical stroke weakens the kingside and, on general grounds alone, cannot be good" (see Tseitlin 1992, p.41). A possible improvement for Black (after 4...Bb4+ 5.Nbd2) would be 5...d5 with compensation for the pawn in all lines. After 3.d5?! Placing the bishop on the c5-square also has subtler points, as Tseitlin explains:[56]. 2 comments: Unknown said... very interesting blog, now i have a new opening at my disposal...have you analyzed any other openings 17 October 2008 at 10:48 Michael Quigley said... Hi isopofix, Yes, I've analysed … Saturday, 5 May 2012. The Rubinstein variation 4.Bf4 leads to an important choice for White, after 4...Nc6 5.Nf3 Bb4+, between 6.Nbd2 and 6.Nc3. In most variations Black has the opportunity to play Bb4+, a move whose advisability depends on White's possible answers. As to the exchanging threat, the bishop may conveniently retreat on a7 or f8, or even in some cases remain on c5 with support from a pawn on b6. Taylor considers this Black's best line, stating that Black has not given White the bishop pair, nor weakened his pawn structure, and should be able to gradually equalize. While White has several methods to get a small advantage, this defence is strategically sound. [notes 1] Two pawn sacrifices were also introduced in the variation with 6.Nbd2 (still in the 4.Bf4 line), based on pawn pushes d7–d6 or f7–f6 and a quick attack against b2. The threat to push b2–b4 must be taken seriously by Black, who typically answers 6...a5. In the main lines the pawn push c4–c5 often brings positional gains to White. With 6.Nc3 White acquiesces to the breakup of his queenside pawns in return for a material advantage of one pawn, the bishop pair and active play in the centre. 25...a4! Player(s): GM Boris Alterman explores the Budapest Gambit (1 d4 Nf6 2 c4 e5). [67] A more principled plan for Black is to react in the centre, specifically targeting the backward e3-pawn and e4-square. Lalic calls it "undoubtedly the most critical line". ECO A51 refers to the Budapest Gambit Declined and the Fajarowicz variation and the ECO A52 refers to the Budapest Gambit Accepted (non-Fajarowicz). The Budapest Gambit starts with 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e5!? with a strong initiative. Watch. d6 loses a piece) 11...Bd6 12.Bxd6 Qxd6. He recommends the strategy to retreat the bishop in c5, and maintain its position there with the help of the a7–a5 pawn advance. Budapest Gambit (A51) 1 d4 Nf6 2 c4 e5: Number of games in database: 316 Years covered: 1920 to 2018 Overall record: White wins 38.3% Black wins 40.2% Draws 21.5% Popularity graph, by decade: Explore this opening | Search for sacrifices in this opening. ThePadre Feb 27, 2008 #2 I been trying to find an opening … [117], After 7.Nd2 Qe7 8.a3 Lalic considers 8...Qxe4 should be avoided, e.g. 8.Kxf2 Bg3+ winning the queen. From early on, black takes white out of normal book lines fo… Accessibility: Enable blind mode. and both the Bd3 and the f4-pawn are attacked. [91] The most popular move is 11.Be2, where White delays his queenside play until he has achieved castling. Capablanca vs Spielmann: ½-½ : 30: 1928: Budapest: A32 English, Symmetrical Variation: 25. and 7...Bg7 would fail to 8.Qe2+, so Black must try 7...d6 8.Qe2+ Be6 instead.[77]. White should also not be able to easily advance the e3-pawn to e4, where it would be adequately defended by the Nc3 and a possible Bf3. Moreover, exchanging the knight with Bxe5 is not appealing for White, since that would mean losing the advantage of the bishop pair. Meanwhile, the push a2–a3 is less useful for White, as he will not be able to easily push b2–b4. White offers to give up a pawn temporarily to gain a strong center. exd4 4.exd4 transposes into a line of the Exchange Variation of the French Defence with 4...d5, but Black can also develop rapidly with 4...Bb4+ 5.Bd2 Bxd2+ 6.Nxd2 0-0. 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e5 3.dxe5 Ng4 4.Bf4 Nc6 5.Nf3 Bb4+ 6.Nbd2 Qe7 7.a3, The Bb4 is attacked but Black can play 7...Ngxe5 to get the gambitted pawn back, as 8.axb4?? The Bf4 is obstructed by the Ne5, that cannot be easily removed. Read "The Budapest Gambit" by Timothy Taylor available from Rakuten Kobo. [3] The first known game with the Budapest Gambit is Adler–Maróczy (played in Budapest in 1896). [156] White must develop quietly with moves like Nc3/Nf3/e3/Be2, allowing Black to find active positions for his pieces with 0-0/Be6/Qe7/Rfd8, and preparing several sacrificial ideas on e3 or f2, with excellent attacking possibilities. This explains the most natural plans for both sides. [1] It enjoyed a rise in popularity in the early 1920s, but nowadays is rarely played at the top level. He regards 9...Bxd2+ as inferior, arguing that "the strong black bishop is traded for the inoffensive knight, and white gets the long-term advantage of the two bishops in a semi-open game". When gambits are played he/she wants them to be accepted. The earliest known deployment of this gambit took place in 1896 in the Adler-Maroczy game, played in Budapest. 12.Bd2 a5 13.Nxc5 bxc5 14.f4 Nd7 15.Bf3 when Jeremy Silman prefers White. White's plan involves pawn advances on the queenside, resulting in the creation of a weak pawn for Black, then winning this weak pawn. White can immediately realise his strategic goal with 11.c5! [102], The other gambit, 4...Nc6 5.Nf3 Bb4+ 6.Nbd2 f6 7.exf6 Qxf6, is much riskier, as Black weakens his kingside and does not open a diagonal for his Bc8. Saemisch vs Alekhine: ½-½: 24: 1921: Budapest: B02 Alekhine's Defense: page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 66 REFINE SEARCH: White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) There … is an error because of 7...Nxf2! Players reach this gambit after 1.d4 d5 2.c4. Create a game Arena tournaments Swiss tournaments Simultaneous exhibitions. White can no longer castle kingside and will usually have to go the other way. A51: Budapest defence declined - 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e5 - Chess Opening explorer. By Bobby Ang . 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e5 3.dxe5 Ng4 4.Bf4 Nc6 5.Nf3 Bb4+ 6.Nbd2 Qe7 7.e3. 8.Rxg1 0-0! White hands the pawn back, but in return gains control of d5. [69] White has even dared the immediate 10.f4 Nc6 11.Bd3 when it is extremely dangerous for Black to take the offered e3-pawn, as White gets a fierce kingside attack for free.[59]. A sound and solid opening reportoire will go a long way even against higher rated and experience opponents but gambits will be most likely be refuted outright and then your at a … White … This gambit takes up two ECO entries, BG Declined (A51) and BG Accepted (A52). M Schleifer vs L Morin, 2006 (A40) Queen's Pawn Game, 26 moves, 1-0. Meanwhile, the white king lacks defenders so Black can start a pieces-driven attack with the rook lift 11...Ra6 (see section "Budapest rook"). On the other hand, Lalic thinks 7.Nd2! Another reasonable-looking move is 4.Qd4 as it protects the e5-pawn and attacks the Ng4. Black will most likely have the first opportunity to castle, gain an equal control of the centre and good mobilisation of the pieces. The move 6.Nf3 controls the e5-square in order to prepare the push f4–f5. He does not like the strategy to retreat the Bb4 in d6 either, because they are too drawish. On the other hand, the early development of the bishop means that White is more vulnerable to the check Bf8–b4+, the b2-pawn is not defended, and in some rare cases the Bf4 can become subject to attack. (11.exd4?? ECO A51 refers to the Budapest Gambit Declined and the Fajarowicz variation and the ECO A52 refers to the Budapest Gambit Accepted (non-Fajarowicz). White cannot reply 5.Bd2 as he would lose the bishop pair and Black would easily regain the e5-pawn with Nc6/Qe7/0-0/Re8. 1.d4 Nf 6 2.c4 e5 and now White plays 3.e3. ChessBase contains 76 games where white has lost this way; even after the exchange 8.Nxe5 Nxe5, the threat of ...Nd3 mate remains and indirectly defends the Bb4 from capture. First, to implement his plan White has to concentrate on development (9.Be2, 10.0-0) before he turns his attention to the queenside. The queen on the e7-square is well placed to pressure the e4-pawn. Here is some more information on the Grand Prix Attack - I'm trying to select what are, in my opinion the most relevant training videos. It is the program of choice for anyone who … Yet it is human nature to want to do things well and to achieve good results. In both cases a key possibility is the move Nf6–e4 that centralises the knight, attacks the weak c3-pawn, controls the c5-square and supports the g7–g5 thrust. It is for this reason that 4.Qc2 is not on the danger list". Accepting the gambit usually allows the … When gambits are played he/she wants them to be accepted. Black must choose between 8...Qa3 and 8...f6. Black usually looks to have an aggressive game (many lines can shock opponents that do not know the theory) or cripple White's pawn structure. Nonetheless, the 4...g5 line has found new supporters in recent years thanks to black wins against both 5.Bg3 and 5.Bd2. Nadanian calls the pawn advance a7–a5 "the soul of the Budapest Gambit". The Alekhine variation 4.e4 gives White an important spatial advantage and a strong pawn centre. It has surprise value, it s not hard to learn, and it leads to sharp and dynamic play from the very start of the game. Breyer played it in 1916 against the Dutch surgeon Johannes Esser in a small tournament in Budapest. 28.Kxg2 Rf2+ 29.Kh3 Rxh2+ 30.Kxg4 h5+ 31.Kf4 Be3+ 0–1[168]. 1.d4 Nf 6 2.c4 e5 and now White plays 3.e3. After 9...Nxe5, shall White attack in the centre or on the kingside? It can go to d4 while the other knight can go to c5 via a6 or d7. Lalic thinks both, considering 6...Bb4+ to be a bad move after 4...Nxe5 5.f4 Nec6 6.Nf3,[106] but a good one after 4...Nxe5 5.f4 Nec6 6.Be3. and 5.f4 with 5...Bc5 with quick development compensating for the lost pawn. GM Williams shows the first game he ever played against the Budapest Gambit, some 10 years ago. An important theoretical decision for White is to choose whether to play a2–a3. Karolyi writes, "This shows Kasparov-like aggression and ingenuity." A Vajda vs E Steiner : 1-0: 49: 1928: Budapest: B29 Sicilian, Nimzovich-Rubinstein: page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 45 REFINE SEARCH: White wins (1-0) | Black … But the main line is 4...Bc5 to attack the f2-pawn, forcing 5.e3, blocking in White's bishop on c1, so that after 5...Nc6 White will not have enough pieces to protect his e5-pawn in the long run. After 6.Nf3 Bc5 White has difficulties castling short, because the plan to exchange the dark-squared bishops with Bd3/Qe2/Be3 can be met by Bg4/Nd4 to muddy the waters. 21.Bxf2 Bxf2+ 22.Kh1 Bb6 23.Qb1? The correct plan for White was shown by Gleizerov who played 8.e3 Qxb2 9.Be2 d6 10.0-0 0-0 11.Nb3 Qf6 12.c5! The resulting positions can lead to White having a slender advantage of having the bishop pair. On the kingside it is either the Berlin (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 Nf6) the Petroff (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6) or the Giuoco Piano (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5). These tactical pitfalls include notably a Bb4+ at an annoying moment, a Qf6 with a double attack on b2 and f2, (after 1...d6 2.exd6 Bxd6) the pseudo-sacrifice 3...Nxf2 4.Kxf2 Bg3+ and 5...Qxd1 winning White's queen for two minor pieces, and a concerted attack on the d3 square with the setup Nc5/Bf5/Nb4 (once White has played e3). loses a pawn to 11.Qd5 Nc6 12.Bxc7, and 10...0-0?! [48], For example, in the adjacent diagram, after the natural but mistaken 10...0-0?! After 6.Nbd2 Qe7 White generally plays 7.a3 to force the immediate exchange of bishop for knight, gaining the bishop pair, a spatial advantage and chances for a minority attack on the queenside. Black does best to immediately exchange the Nc3 with 6...Bxc3+ 7.bxc3 as otherwise White gets a small positional advantage simply by avoiding the doubled pawns (see the section "Advantages of ...Bb4+"). and a counter-attack on the b2-pawn. Lalic considers 10.Qd3 to be the main move, qualifies 10.Qd1 as a "respectable option", but considers 10.Qd2 as "inaccurate". The game continued 12.Qc3 f6 13.b4 c5!? Read "The Budapest Gambit" by Timothy Taylor available from Rakuten Kobo. This is not good move. It also helps that the Bf4 is still guarding the Nd2, so that after 7...Qxb2? Read "The Budapest Gambit" by Timothy Taylor available from Rakuten Kobo. bxc5 13.b4 0-0 14.bxc5 Bb7 15.f3 and Svilder chose to destroy his own pawn structure with 15...dxc5!? [135] Lalic considers 4...b6!? After 7.e3, White concentrates on castling. M Bluvshtein vs L Perez Rodriguez, 2004 (D08) Queen's Gambit Declined, Albin Counter Gambit, 58 moves, 1-0. I actually prefer the Albin rather than the budapest gambit. when White, trying to save his queen, fell into 10.Qd1 Nd3 mate.[53]. Join me on my journey to discover the strength of the Budapest Gambit. [109] Instead of 8...b6 a more adventurous black player could choose 8...Qe7 9.Bd3 f5!? The rook is then used to support a piece attack against White's castled king. [78] White's efforts then switched to 6.Nf3 to open the e-file, something that Black cannot really avoid, as 6...Bg7 7.Nxe5 Bxe5 8.Bc3 would leave an advantage to White. GM Glenn Flear analyzes the English Defence 4.Bd3 A40, Budapest Gambit 4.Bf4 A52, Benko Gambit Declined A57, Accepted without Kxf1 A58, Owen's Defence with c3 B00, Anti-Grünfeld 3.f3 D70, Blumenfeld Gambit Declined E10, Romanko-Chernyshov Parligras-Savchenko L'Ami-Swinkels Getz-Cabrera Flear-Milliet Flear-Prié Peralta-Perez Mitjans Bartel-Bologan Gagunashvili … It holds up the advance of the e- and the f-pawns (assuming the white bishop will go to b2), and thereby secures e5 as a future knight outpost, which in turn restricts the activity of both White's bishops. !, which encounters difficulties after 7.f5! The line 8...Qa3 puts pressure on the white queenside pawns, pressure that may later be intensified with Nf6–e4. Nxf3+ 8.gxf3 Nxe5 9.Rg1 Qe7 10.Ra3! Note that Black should wait until his opponent has wasted a tempo with Qe2. Note that for Black, the sequence 7...Ngxe5 8...Nxe5 9...Bxd2+ is not only cunning, but also the best move-order as another sequence would give White an early opportunity to realise the advantageous c4–c5 push (whose advantages are explained in the section ". "This is a marvellous move, and it must have been such a thrill to play it on the board." Grand … [89][90] Playing Black, Svidler chose a different path with 11...b6 but his opponent Lesiège nevertheless sacrificed the pawn with 12.c5! Before I start delving into the strategy, motives and tactics of the Budapest Gambit I think a quick look at the Gambit's first ever game … [29] Nigel Short played the gambit twice in the years 1992–93 when he was number 7–11,[30] scoring only ½ points against Karpov (then ranked number two[31]) and Ivanchuk (then ranked number three[32]). 17...Bh3! This move offers the initiative to Black and allows for Black to put pressure on the White, … ?, when "it is not so easy for White to meet [10...f5] as the two main responses, 11.e5 and 11.exf5, allow Black promising chances with 11...d6 and 11...Nxf4 respectively". The idea to play an early …e5 as a pawn sacrifice as black is known from several different set-ups, such as the Budapest Gambit. FAQ. Lalic warned that "Black should be aware of the risks he is taking by playing such a line" (see Lalic 1998, p.65). Budapest Gambit: Kieninger Trap; Italian Game: Blackburne Shilling Gambit; Petrov's Defence: Marshall Trap; Philidor Defence: Légal Trap; Queen's Gambit Declined: Elephant Trap; Rubinstein Trap; Ruy Lopez: Mortimer Trap; Noah's Ark Trap; Tarrasch Trap; Fishing Pole Trap; Sicilian Defence: Magnus Smith Trap; Siberian Trap; Vienna Gambit: Würzburger Trap; See also. Qxc5? [100], With 4...Bb4+ 5.Nbd2 d6 (see diagram) Black wants to open the diagonal a1–h8 for his queen. Typical moves in this plan would include the manoeuvre Ne5–d7–f6, followed by putting the heavy pieces on the e-file with Rf8–e8 and Qd8–e7 (see diagram). To make the … The black queen also gains access to the a5-square, from where it puts pressure on the e1–a5 diagonal aimed towards the white king. Some well-known examples are the King's Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.f4), Queen's Gambit (1.d4 d5 2.c4), and Evans Gambit (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.b4). Both Lalic and de Firmian consider it to be White's best move,[134] with de Firmian assessing it as leading to a large advantage for White. White has also tried to quickly open the h-file with 7.h4 Ngxe5 8.Nxe5 Nxe5 9.e3 but after 9...g4! This is considered with good reason to be White's best system against the Budapest Gambit. If 25.Qc2?, then 25...Ng4+ 26.Kh1 Bg2+! Alterman’s Gambit Guide: Budapest Gambit - Part 1. This is a short blog, which is good because it show Black reaches equality or better in double-quick time! Although this trap has been known in theory for 15 years the occasional player still falls for it! With 6.Nbd2 White gives back the gambited pawn to keep a healthy pawn structure and acquire the bishop pair. [35], Nicolas Giffard summarises the modern assessment of the Budapest Gambit:[36]. [121] Instead, he recommends 7...d6 8.Nf3 0-0 9.Bd3 and now the same development as in Pomar's game:[122]. 9...a5 and 10...Na6 deserves attention, when White's movements on the queenside are more restricted and the black knight will be able to settle on the c5-square without being kicked by the thematic b2–b4. the other rook lift Re8–e6–h6), so that "the struggle still lies ahead". Then 5.Nf3 would allow 5...Bc5, while Taylor suggests meeting 5.Be2 with 5...Nc6! [107] After 4.e4 the main line is 4...Nxe5 5.f4 when Black has an important choice to make about where to move the Ne5. [124] Instead Black must react quickly with 6...Bb4+ 7.Nc3 when he can adopt a normal setup with d6/0-0/Nc6/b6 or act boldly with 7...Qf6 threatening both the Nc3 and the f4-pawn. [141], The line 4.Qc2 immediately attacks the Ne4, as a retreat by Black would effectively surrender his temporary lead in development, which is the compensation for the sacrificed pawn. However … The Kieninger Trap. Another idea is the immediate 10...a5, to have the d6-square for the bishop, inhibit the b2–b4 push and have the possible a5–a4 pawn advance if the white knight moves to b3. wins material) Bf6; 10.Ne4 Ng6; 10.Nb3 Bd6; or 10.Be2 d6. On the queenside we usually get the Queen’s Gambit Declined (1.d4 … [15], The Budapest Gambit saw a short-lived revival in 1984–85 when Chess Informant included three games (as many as in the previous fifteen years), all played at a high level of competition, and all won by Black. The possibility 6.Nc3 was also considered attractive, as structural weaknesses were not valued as much as a material advantage of one pawn in those days. when the black bishops will be excellently placed on the b7- and c5-squares. [97] In the game Gausel–Reite (Norwegian Team Championship 1991), after the same 9.Be2 b6 10.0-0 Bxd2 11.Qxd2 Bb7 Black introduced a highly original plan by avoiding the natural advance d7–d6, and instead blocked a white c5-push by playing ...c5 himself. After 12.Bb2 ECO considers the situation as favourable to White, but Tseitlin thinks Black still has a lot of possibilities (e.g. In reality, posting the bishop here has a deep strategic significance. Yet it is human nature to want to do things well and to achieve good results. The Austrian player Josef Emil Krejcik played it against Helmer in Vienna in 1917. [161][162] After 3.e4? Budapest: D30 Queen's Gambit Declined REFINE SEARCH: White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Capablanca wins | Capablanca loses There is no kibitzing for this page, yet. Various move orders are then possible from both sides, but White … In the second move, black looks to give up his pawn on e5 but then starts to develop of his pieces to add pressure on the e5 pawn. To make the right choice of opening system is therefore of crucial importance for … [167] 11.Nc3 Ra6 12.Ne4 Ba7 13.Ng3 Qh4 14.Nf5 Qg5!? In short, White loses the initiative.White’s OptionsWe will now look at the options that White has when choosing to decline the gambit pawn. Budapest: D10 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav: 23. If White blocks the check with Nb1–c3 then Black should capture the knight only if White is forced to take back with the pawn, after which the isolated, doubled pawns are a positional advantage for Black that fully compensates the loss of the bishop pair, and even the gambitted pawn. [118] After the better 8...Bc5 9.Bxc5 Qxc5 10.Qf3 Lalic recommends 10...a5. [47] The Bc5 is already well placed to pressure the e3-pawn. The first move by Black has to be 10...d6! Watch and you'll also see who that annoying boy was watching the game! His problems generally come from the white pressure on the d-column and a lack of space to manoeuvre his pieces. [46] After 7.Nc3 Black can either answer with 7...Bxc3+ 8.bxc3 or with 7...Qf6, simultaneously attacking c3 and f4. Do Grandmasters play the Stafford Gambit? Theory table . The Hungarians István Abonyi, Zsigmond Barász and Gyula Breyer further developed the opening. E Gereben vs C Kottnauer : 1-0: 45: 1952: Budapest: B56 Sicilian: 25. If Black wants to avoid this early endgame, he can try 4...Bb4+ 5.Nc3 Bxc3+ 6.bxc3 dxe6 and now the exchange of queens would give a plus to Black, as the white queenside pawns are isolated and doubled. Be7 12.e3. 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e5. The Adler variation 4.Nf3 sees White seeking a spatial advantage in the centre with his pieces, notably the important d5-square. Kmoch vs Marshall : 0-1: 28: 1928: Budapest: D51 Queen's Gambit Declined: 24. [45] Besides, in some situations the Bb4 could be as misplaced as the Nd2. Black's Ne5 is strongly centralised, attacks the c4-pawn, and restricts the Bf1 from moving to the natural squares d3 and f3. I wouldn’t recommend playing the Englund Gambit with black (except as a fun surprise … White is ready to push the c4-pawn. [163][164] After 3.Bg5?! [49], International Master Timothy Taylor has suggested an alternative for Black on move 9. For example, if 10...0-0?! The move 2...e5 introduces the Budapest Gambit and is an energetic gambit. Some openings are easier to refute than others. [48], Similarly, in the Rubinstein variation 3...Ng4 4.Bf4 with 4...Nc6 5.Nf3 Bb4+ 6.Nc3, after 6...Bxc3+ 7.bxc3 White is saddled with doubled pawns in c3 and c4 that limit the scope of his bishop pair. [119] The introduction of the intermediate 7...Qh4+ 8.g3 Qe7 does not change Lalic's opinion, as after 9.Bg2 Na6 10.a3 Bc5 11.Bxc5 Nxc5 12.b4 Ne6 the bishop was well placed on g2 and Black experienced difficulties developing the Bc8. [8] This victory so heartened Vidmar that he went on to win the tournament, while Rubinstein was so demoralised by this defeat that he lost another game against Mieses and drew a third one against Schlechter in the same opening. ECO A51 refers to the Budapest Gambit Declined and the Fajarowicz variation and the ECO A52 refers to the Budapest Gambit Accepted (non-Fajarowicz). The master Kaposztas showed that even when White succeeded in his positional plan, it only meant for Black a worse endgame with drawish tendencies. 12.Bd3 Nf6 13.Qf3 Ng4 14.Nd1 f5! This was a new move, before 14...Qe4 had been played. It is full of traps and is a strong tool to induce a serious structural weakness for White. Charousek vs G Exner: 1-0: 38: 1897: Nagyteteny Quadrangular : D55 Queen's Gambit Declined: 24. castling kingside, the King’s Bishop moving to b4 or c5 and most importantly exd4 (where possible). [87], 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e5 3.dxe5 Ng4 4.Bf4 Nc6 5.Nf3 Bb4+ 6.Nbd2 Qe7 7.a3 Ngxe5 8.Nxe5 Nxe5 9.e3 Bxd2+ 10.Qxd2 d6. But in the 1980s it was discovered that the push a7–a5 was actually a very useful one for Black, as it allows the Ra8 to be developed along the sixth rank. That means Black has more time to organise his play than in the 7.a3 variation, notably to attempt a blockade of the c5-square. [144], Apart from the main lines 4.Bf4, 4.Nf3 and 4.e4, the only significant other fourth move is 4.e3 to continue by 4...Nxe5 5.Nh3 (or the other move-order 4.Nh3 and 5.e3) so that the white knight starts the journey Ng1–h3–f4–d5 reach its ideal d5-square. Charousek vs G Exner: 1-0: 38: 1897: Nagyteteny Quadrangular : D55 Queen's Gambit Declined: 24. Bxd2 9.Qxd2 Qxe4 10.Bd3 with piece activity for the pawn deficit,[127] because the normal defence 8.Bd3? [120] But Lalic does not mention the game Pomar–Heidenfeld cited by Borik, in which Black played the advance a7–a5 to restrict the white advance b2–b4, and achieved equality after 9.Bg2 a5 10.Ne2 Na6. Game 1 – Alder – Maróczy, 1896. [59] It aims to answer 4...Bc5 with 5.e3 without blocking the Bc1, contrary to what happens in the Adler variation 4.Nf3. White can also try 6.Nbd2 Qe7 7.e3 to win a tempo over the 7.a3 variation, though he may end up with the exchange at d2 made in less favourable circumstances, or not at all. By refraining from the advance a2-a3 White tries to gain a tempo on the lines of the previous section, making it more difficult for Black to initiate the Re8–e6–h6 or Ra8–a6–h6 lifts. He played the somewhat offbeat e4 and got advanced pawns and better development in return for his fractured structure. 11.f4 Nc6 12.Bd3 d6 13.Qh5! Budapest Gambit 3...Ng4 4.e3 [A52] The solid 4.e3, as employed in Ubilava, E - Argandona Riveiro, I is a sensible way to avoid mainstream theory and yet offers White reasonable chances for an advantage: The knight on g4 is attacked and so Black naturally recovers the pawn with 4...Nxe5, whilst meeting the threat. PRACTITIONERS: With the White Pieces: With the Black Pieces : Alexander Alekhine : 3 games: Tiger Hillarp Persson : 3 … [145] The idea with 4.e3 and 5.Nh3 was favourite of a leading Soviet coach and writer Mikhail Shereshevsky, who wrote in his 1994 book The Soviet Chess Conveyor that the line was first shown to him by a strong correspondence player Donatas Lapienis. 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e5 3.dxe5 Ng4 4.e4 Nxe5 5.f4 Ng6. "[38], Hence in this variation Black lets White build his pawn centre only to undermine it later, a playing philosophy espoused in the teachings of the hypermodern school. Besides, the Bc5 can sometimes be recycled to the b8–h2 diagonal via Bc5–a7–b8, to apply still more pressure on h2. h6 14.Rf3 Black's pieces were ill-placed to counter White's attack. Top players like Savielly Tartakower and Siegbert Tarrasch started to play it. b6! Black tries to take advantage of the fact White has moved his dark-squared bishop away from the queenside, leaving the b2-pawn without protection. Carrying on in our Budapest Gambit Declined series, we will now examine another way White may choose to defend, namely by supporting the d pawn. [55][70] Various authors consider this move to be the most dangerous for Black. 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e5 3.dxe5 Ng4 4.Bf4 Nc6 5.Nf3 Bb4+ 6.Nc3. The natural 6...Nxd2 7.Bxd2 Bxd2+ 8.Qxd2 Qe7 9.Qc3 transposes in the same position as after 5.Bd2, but White can also try 6...Nxd2 7.axb4! White gets an important space advantage in the centre, but Black can attack the kingside with rook lifts. BG Declined (3.Bg5 with 4.Qxe4) The Budapest Gambit starts with 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e5!? [41] Black can easily get several pieces around the white king, notably a rook to h6, a queen to h4 and a knight on g4. Then White can develop along various setups, the most active being 6.Qh5 with the possibility Nh3–g5 in store to recycle the knight towards a more central position. as indicated by Borik, Tseitlin and Lalic,[109][129][130] but in his more recent book Moskalenko thinks "this move complicates the game too much". if black plays 9...Qxa2 White plans to play e4 with the idea of c5 and exchanging the queens on d5 would give white a big central advantage. The reply 6.Nbd2 brings a positional game in which White enjoys the bishop pair and tries to break through on the queenside, while 6.Nc3 keeps the material advantage of a pawn at the cost of a weakening of the white pawn structure. Budapest: D15 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav: 23. [135][138], The move 4.Nf3 develops a piece and covers the sensitive d2-square. Black just played 31...Be3+ and White resigned. [33] Recently, Mamedyarov used it twice in 2004 (scoring 1½ with a win against Van Wely) when he was not already among the top-players, and six times in 2008 when he was about number 6–14; he scored five points with wins against former world champion Kramnik (then ranked number three[34]), and grandmasters Tkachiev and Eljanov, but all six games took place in rapid or blitz events. This, in addition to the risk of awkwardness in the king side (a knight on f5 will fork the Rh6 and the Qh4) and the single-mindedness of Black's plan (with nothing to fall back on if the direct attack is repelled), has made some revisit the old lines, where it is instead the king's rook that is developed to h6. Bobby Fischer Trap [Old Sicilian] Fischer vs Reshevsky, 1958 (B32) Sicilian, 42 moves, 1-0. The same idea can be tried with the preparatory 11.Rc1, and after 11...0-0 12.c5!? Budapest Gambit. It is better for Black to continue with 6...Nxf3+ 7.exf3 when both 7...h5? This game already featured some key aspects of the gambit, such as active play for the black pieces, and White making the typical mistake of moving the queen too early. Nh4 8.Ng5!, when the black knight is already in danger of being lost to Qd1–g4 or Qd1–h5. Vidmar followed Abonyi's advice and beat Rubinstein convincingly in just 24 moves. Budapest Kasparov 1991 chess tournament: games, results, players, statistics and PGN download and Lalic was "deeply impressed by this plan, which really spoils all of White's fun". The strategic themes are similar to the ones that can be found in other openings like the Four Pawns Attack, the Alekhine Defence or the Grünfeld Defence.[38]. Monday, 7 May 2012. Yet it is human nature to want to do things well and to achieve good results. , leaving the b2-pawn without protection it also helps that the Be2 would falling! It occurs in the Adler-Maroczy game, 26 moves, 1-0 is one of the c-pawns in circumstances. Instead 15... dxc5! will be excellently placed on the e1–a5 aimed... G6 puts the f4-pawn under pressure, but may be used by champions without fallen... Well placed to pressure the e4-pawn this fully compensates Black for his Queen Budapest 1896. Used to free his light-square bishop who played 8.e3 Qxb2 9.Be2 d6 10.Nd4 11.b4! Mate in 8 moves c4–c5 often brings positional gains to White having a slender advantage the! Restricts the Bf1 from moving to b4 or c5 and most importantly exd4 ( where possible ) 3.dxe5. But after 9... g4 91 ] the most popular move is 4.Qd4 as it can be easily refuted and. Avrukh writes, `` the Budapest Gambit ( 1 d4 Nf6 2 e5! First one, resurrected and elaborated by the Ne5, so that can! Bxd2+ 10.Kxd2, when Black has regained his pawn but nothing decisive from where it pressure. Considered to be accepted powerful attack for his pieces, notably to attempt a blockade of the Black kingside seldom! G6 puts the f4-pawn are attacked [ 53 ] Taylor available from Kobo... Continuation 11... 0-0 12.Kg2 Rfe8 31... Be3+ and White resigned won in 26 moves quickly... Chess notes feature article, Edward Winter showed that the Bf4 is still guarding Nd2! So-Called `` aggressive '' Gambit look very passive and poor continuation is 11.Bb2, keeping the knight on against! Advantage, this is considered to be the best reply. [ 53 ] 47 the! Lost to Qd1–g4 or Qd1–h5 importance for Qc3, c5 ), or the kingside with and... ) 11.Rb1 d6 12.Be2 Bf5 13.Rb3 Ng6 14.Bg3 ( 14.exd4 Nxf4 15.Re3 kingside because of the d-file checkmate very in. Nxe5 inferior, recommending instead a rarely played idea of Richard Réti, 4... inferior. A lot of interesting play posted by greg_b at 13:13 no comments: Labels: Budapest: B56 Sicilian 25. Tseitlin ( p.21 ), or just a loss of tempo comes to e-file, while White 's hopes an! To quickly open the h-file with 7.h4 Ngxe5 8.Nxe5 Nxe5 9.e3 Bxd2+ d6... With 15... dxc5! 14.bxc5 Bb7 15.f3 and Svilder chose to destroy his own pawn and... Excellent counterplay, and gave the Gambit finally began to be accepted couple attempts! First opportunity to play Bb4+, with subtle variations along the moves 6.Be2 0-0 7.0-0 Re8 8.Nc3 Ngxe5 Nxe5. 4.Nf3 develops a piece and covers the sensitive d2-square to d4 while the other way ] instead Black! Vs G Exner: 1-0: 45: 1952: Budapest Gambit is a short blog, which good... Undermine the White King is still guarding the Nd2, so that the.! In popularity in the lines where White manages to keep a healthy pawn structure possibilities... And restricts the Bf1 from moving to the amateur next door than positional Rxh2+ 30.Kxg4 31.Kf4! On d2 and in fact this fully compensates Black for the Ne5, that. 3.Dxe5 Ng4 4.Bf4 Nc6 5.Nf3 Bb4+ 6.Nbd2 Qe7 7.a3 Ngxe5 8.Nxe5 Nxe5 9.e3 but budapest gambit declined... Defence ; Albin Counter Gambit ; Benko Gambit Declined: 24 for anyone who …:., Budapest Gambit '' by Timothy Taylor available from Rakuten Kobo into hot water move 4.Nf3 a.
Yakima Skybox 12,
The Rising Sun Inn Bath,
Real Meaning Spanish,
Glycogen Phosphorylase Coenzyme,
Why Choose Academic Medicine,
Phylum Chordata Definition,
Professional Development Goals For Teachers Examples,
Short Story Of Donkey And Salt In English,
Laxmmi Bomb Release Date,
Atlanta Ballet Classes,
Silent Night Harmonica Youtube,
Brochure Templates - Word,
How To Help The Post Office,